Comparisons / ack

ripgrep vs ack

ack pioneered developer-friendly code search and introduced the idea of skipping irrelevant files automatically. ripgrep carries those ideas forward with native performance that's 40× faster — no Perl required.

Quick Verdict

ack is well-designed and pleasant to use, but it's written in Perl and therefore limited by Perl's I/O and regex throughput. On the Linux kernel source tree, ack takes over 3 seconds while ripgrep finishes in 0.08 seconds — a 40× difference. If you're a current ack user, switching to ripgrep gives you the same developer-friendly experience at a fraction of the time. The flags are similar enough that the learning curve is minimal.

Feature Comparison

Feature ripgrep ack
Speed (large codebase) ✅ Fastest 🐢 ~40× slower
Respects .gitignore ✅ Yes (default) ⚠️ Partial (.ackrc)
Skips hidden files ✅ Yes (default) ✅ Yes (default)
Skips binary files ✅ Yes (default) ✅ Yes (default)
Unicode support ✅ Always on ✅ Yes (Perl)
PCRE2 regex ✅ With -P ✅ Perl regex always
File type filtering ✅ -t flag ✅ --type flag
Compressed file search ✅ With -z ❌ No
Single binary ✅ Yes ✅ (Perl script)
JSON output ✅ --json ❌ No
Config file ✅ .ripgreprc ✅ .ackrc
Windows support ✅ Native ⚠️ Requires Perl
No runtime required ✅ Yes ❌ Requires Perl
Actively maintained ✅ Yes ✅ Yes (slowly)

Speed

ack's Perl implementation is the primary bottleneck. On the Linux kernel source tree, ack takes 3.2 s vs ripgrep's 0.08 s — about 40× slower. ack also doesn't parallelize directory traversal, so the gap is especially pronounced on multi-core systems.

See the benchmarks page for full data.

When to use each

Use ripgrep when:

  • Speed matters at all
  • You don't want a Perl dependency
  • You need Windows native support
  • You want JSON output or compressed file search
  • Searching large codebases (monorepos, Linux kernel scale)

ack may suit you if:

  • You already have Perl and a complex .ackrc
  • You rely on ack-specific Perl regex features
  • Your searches are on small codebases where speed is irrelevant

Command Equivalents

Task ripgrep ack
Basic search rg 'pattern' ack 'pattern'
Case-insensitive rg -i 'pattern' ack -i 'pattern'
Word boundary rg -w 'word' ack -w 'word'
Invert match rg -v 'pattern' ack -v 'pattern'
Count matches rg -c 'pattern' ack -c 'pattern'
List matching files rg -l 'pattern' ack -l 'pattern'
Context (3 lines) rg -C 3 'pattern' ack -C 3 'pattern'
Only Python files rg -t py 'pattern' ack --python 'pattern'
Only JS/TS files rg -t js -t ts 'pattern' ack --js --ts 'pattern'
Search hidden files rg -. 'pattern' ack --unrestricted 'pattern'
Fixed string rg -F 'literal' ack -Q 'literal'
Show file names only rg -l 'pattern' ack -l 'pattern'

Migration from ack

Most ack flags have direct ripgrep equivalents. The main differences: file types use -t typename instead of --typename, and the fixed-string flag is -F instead of -Q.

# ack --python 'def ' → ripgrep equivalent
rg -t py 'def '

# ack -Q 'literal.string' → ripgrep equivalent
rg -F 'literal.string'

# ack --unrestricted → ripgrep equivalent (search everything)
rg -uu 'pattern'

# Convert your .ackrc to .ripgreprc
# .ackrc:    --color
# .ripgreprc: --color=always

# Shell alias for muscle memory
alias ack='rg'